Atlas AI Resources

← Back to AI News

AI policy

Trump Picked an AI Czar. The Rules for AI Have Not Changed Yet.

Published October 5, 2026

On Sunday, October 4, President Trump said Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton will lead a new White House group called the Super Intelligence Force. It caps a week in which the White House told federal agencies to stop saying “artificial intelligence” and six AI industry leaders signed a voluntary safety pledge. Together, these moves change who speaks for the government on AI and what it calls the technology. None of them is a new law.

What happened

First, on September 29, Trump signed an executive order (a directive to federal agencies that does not need a vote in Congress) titled “Inaugurating the Era of Super Intelligence.” It tells agencies to use “Super Intelligence” and “SI” instead of “artificial intelligence” and “AI” in letters, websites, reports, and other documents. The order defines SI as the same technology already covered by the legal definition of artificial intelligence in federal law. It gives the president’s science adviser 60 days to propose new legal wording, and it says past regulations, contracts, and grants do not have to be changed.

Second, after a White House lunch that same day, Sundar Pichai of Google, Elon Musk of SpaceXSI, Dario Amodei of Anthropic, Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, Greg Brockman of OpenAI, and Jensen Huang of Nvidia signed the “White House Accord on Super Intelligence.” It says each company “should” put four layers of checks on its frontier models (the most capable systems a company builds). The layers are internal controls that watch for risks such as cyberattacks, biological and chemical threats, and models getting into computer systems they should not; an internal team that makes sure those controls work; an independent outside auditor that tests them; and a board committee that oversees the results. Trump called the accord “morally binding.” House Speaker Mike Johnson, quoted by CNBC, described its commitments as “voluntary.”

Third, on October 4, Trump posted on Truth Social that Clayton will lead the new task force, joined by Federal Trade Commission Chair Andrew Ferguson, Pentagon research and engineering chief Emil Michael, and Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor. NPR and the BBC quote the post as saying the group will “coordinate the Federal Government’s engagement with Consumers, Public Interest Groups, Religious Organizations, Critical Infrastructure Providers, and Super Intelligence Companies.” CBS News and the BBC report that it will answer to the president and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.

Why it matters to a normal person

Congress has not passed a broad federal AI law, NPR notes, though some states, including California, have their own rules. The BBC reports that the administration has largely left AI companies to regulate themselves. So most of the safety work behind the chatbots and AI agents (programs that take actions on their own, like browsing the web or running code) that people use still comes from the companies that build them.

The accord puts that self-checking in writing, and one of its four layers is real outside testing. That is the part worth watching. A company saying its controls work is a claim. An independent auditor testing those controls and reporting what failed is evidence.

What it does not mean

It does not mean AI suddenly got smarter. In research circles, superintelligence usually means a hypothetical system far beyond human ability, and the BBC reports that some experts say the new name could cause confusion. The order itself says SI means the same technology the law already calls AI.

It does not create binding rules. The accord says companies “should” adopt the checks and that “over time, it may make sense” to turn them into laws or regulations. Its text names no auditor, deadline, or penalty. Sen. Mark Warner, quoted by CNBC, said “changing what we call artificial intelligence does nothing to address the very real risks that come with increasingly powerful AI systems.”

And it does not yet say what the task force will do beyond coordinating. NPR notes it is unclear what Clayton’s appointment means for the industry. What counts is whether outside audits actually happen, who sees the results, and what happens when a check fails.

Sources